Research Creative   My Account   Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Grant Editing and Evaluation is a personalized, expert scientific consultation that seeks to elevate the benchmark for your grant proposal. You let us know your funding target, and we help you re-engineer your proposal to improve your Grant Score . Our editor and grant expert takes your proposal line-by-line to improve the language. Crucially, we rework your language and provide suggestions from a senior editor in your field (PhD or MD); each editor has a track record of successful grant submissions with major funding agencies. For flexibility, we offer two service options. The Essentials Level provides a complete, accurate language edit and focuses on a rigorous and comprehensive scientific evaluation of your proposal. The Signature Level extends this evaluation to include a full proposal rework with extensive revisions and recommendations via our Editor Commentary document, and comprehensive formatting according to your funder’s requirements. This ensures that your proposal meets high writing standards in English and that the level of the proposal’s structure and the scientific rigor are elevated. Importantly, our team focuses on the novelty and impact outlined in your proposal in order to raise your proposal above the benchmark set by the funders. The ultimate goal of Grant Evaluation and Editing is to increase your Grant Score and ensure that your submission will stand out during the selection process.




Our Service

Our editors will
Perform our Language Editing service
Evaluate your proposal and revise according to specific Grant Score    criteria
Correct errors, omissions, and deficiencies to raise your Grant Score   and mitigate reviewer criticisms
Perform our comprehensive Scientific Editing service
Provide a rigorous rework of your proposal according to our Grant   Score criteria with revisions and comments that improve the benchmark   of your proposal
Improve clarity and rigor of your scientific logic, hypotheses, literature   review, methodology, and statistical analysis
Identify and correct errors, omissions, and deficiencies that would   otherwise be used by reviewers to reject your proposal
Complete formatting according to the guidelines of your funder
You will receive
Benchmark improvements to the text for a clear and accurate   proposal
A track-changed Word document with in-line revisions designed to   raise your Grant Score
The LetPub Proposal Scoresheet outlining improvements made to   your Grant Score and options for further enhancing your research   plan
Quality control and editorial oversight of your proposal by a senior   associate editor and managing editor
Benchmark improvements to the text for a clear, accurate, and
   scientifically rigorous proposal
A track-changed Word document with in-line revisions and comments   that identify and correct language and scientific concerns
Elevation of the novelty and impact statements to help you   outcompete other applicants
A full Editor Commentary file that addresses all potentially significant   reviewer concerns and criticisms and provides scientific feedback   from our editor
The LetPub Proposal Scoresheet outlining improvements made to   your Grant Score and options for further enhancing your research   plan
Full revision and guidance on missing or incomplete components   according to your funder’s formatting requirements
Quality control and editorial oversight of your proposal by a senior   associate editor and managing editor
      Pricing      
Starting at $195

Starting at $515

  Time  
5-7 business days

7-13 business days






Our Guarantee

Our track record allows us to offer the following guarantee: If the client accepts all recommended changes and the document is still rejected solely for errors in punctuation, spelling, or grammar, then LetPub will re-edit the document for free or provide a full refund of the editing service




Testimonials

Junxia Feng

Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology

Our team has done article editing with LetPub many times. LetPub's editing service is good, the editing quality is high, and it is trustworthy.

Dr. Alessandra Bonanni

Nanyang Technological University

Collaborating with LetPub for the design of my journal cover was a real pleasure. Service received was very fast and professional, and the image provided was of a very high quality and got immediately accepted as Front Cover in ChemElectroChem journal. I strongly recommend this service.

Kai Lu

Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University

LetPub's service is very professional and the finished product was very good. I will recommend LetPub to all my colleagues!

Yike Shen

Columbia University (United States)

We had a smooth experience translating our design to beautiful Cover Art using the LetPub Cover Art service. The process was easy. We met with the team, filled out a form, and provided a conceptual drawing to the team. The team made an exceptional draft cover in one week. We requested a minor revision of the draft cover, then it was done. We will definitely use LetPub's cover service again!

Runjie Wang

Tongji University

As a whole, LetPub is highly professional in language editing, and the service is also very considerate. Thank you LetPub for its timely and effective help on the long road of my paper publication!

Bin Wang

Anhui University Of Science & Technology

I have used LetPub for language editing of SCI papers three times. LetPub's paper language editing service is very professional, the revisions are very detailed, and the revised manuscripts are returned in a timely manner. At present, LetPub has become a must for Ph.D. SCI submissions in our research group.

Qiu Du

Yangzhou University

The polishing effect is good every time. LetPub is very trustworthy!

Shao-Qing Cai

Peking University (China)

The English editor (scientific editor) not only polished the English of our manuscript, including grammar, punctuation, and overall readability, but also significantly contributed to the academic expression by providing constructive feedback on the paper's framework, constituent elements, results, and conclusions. This included appropriately compressing lengthy or repetitive sections, suggesting structural modifications, identifying ambiguous passages, rewriting academic descriptions, questioning certain statements in the paper, and offering constructive academic suggestions. All of these insights and assistance have been very inspiring and helpful for us as authors. Thank you very much to the editor.



© 2010-2024  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service