2025-02-19

Can only one person accept the review, will more reviewers be invited later, or will the submission be rejected due to insufficient reviewers?

2025-02-16

I have been stuck with a 4B card for 7 days too. I am so anxious to see you in a month. Please, I can't wait that long.

2024-11-15

23 September 2024 Submission created
2 October 2024 Peer review invitations sent
3 October 2024 First peer reviewer allocated
5 October 2024 Two or more peer reviewers allocated
13 October 2024 Report sent to the Editor-in-Chief
14 October 2024 Report: revise with changes
5 November 2024 Resubmitted manuscript received
14 November 2024 Sent to Editor-in-Chief for acceptance or rejection
15 November 2024 Accepted for publication, invoice sent
Overall, the process feels quite fast, and the opinions of the two peer reviewers are also quite friendly. I hope the journal will continue to improve.

2024-11-14

Overall, the processing speed is relatively slow, but the editors are very friendly.

2024-10-25

Overall slow process. Submitted in March of the 24th year, the editor returned the manuscript in May, saying that a figure was not labeled and needed to be added (although it was actually labeled). This wasted two months. Officially submitted for review on 5-28, one reviewer immediately responded with comments, while the other reviewer delayed until 7-23. The editor decided to give a deadline for revisions by 8-30. It took 14 days to make the revisions and send them back (9-15), and then the editor provided feedback on formatting suggestions (which was usually replied to on the same day). Entered the final decision stage on 9-20, and officially accepted on 10-23. Not recommended for submitting graduation articles, as it was a very torturous process.

2024-09-27

Submitted on May 14, 2024, it took a long time for the Editorial Team to reply and request for the original data. The process involved multiple rounds of providing and re-providing the data until the Editorial Team contact person changed (thank goodness the previous lady was on vacation!). On July 31, 2024, the article was under review. On September 2, 2024, the review comments were returned, requesting revisions. A response letter was sent on September 19, 2024. On September 25, 2024, 2 images were resubmitted as requested due to high pixelation. Finally, on September 26, 2024, the article was accepted for publication.

Despite encountering some trouble with the initial contact during the first stage, the review process was relatively quick, and the editorial team demonstrated high efficiency with timely email updates at each stage. Overall, the impression was quite positive. This being the second article, although the impact factor has slightly decreased in recent years, I still believe it is good enough for graduation purposes.

2024-09-08

The manuscript has been submitted and entered into the initial review process by the editorial department.

2024-09-07

Research focus: Biomaterials; Exosome experience sharing: What does 1ab compliance check mean?

2024-08-15

The processing is a bit slow, need to push for it, high formatting requirements
14 March 2024, Submission created
9 May 2024, Awaiting re-submission
13 May 2024, Editorial checks completed moved to Compliance checks
27 May 2024, Peer review selection
31 May 2024, Two or more peer reviewers allocated
21 June 2024, Second or more peer reviewer reports returned
14 August 2024, Accepted for publication, invoice sent

2024-08-05

We need the original WB data. It doesn't have to be rejected outright, depending on the situation and the editor's discretion.