2025-03-01

2024.10.20 Submitted With Editor
2024.10.27 Under Review
2024.12.10 Required Reviews Completed
2024.12.21 Submissions Needing Revision (60 days given)
2025.01.29 Resubmitted With Editor Under Review
2025.02.20 Revision Required
2025.02.24 Resubmitted After Revision
2025.02.25 Accepted

It seems that three reviewers were sought, but only two returned their reviews. One reviewer suggested publication after revisions and raised around 20 questions, including ambiguities in the literature review, additional references, and spelling; the second reviewer found it acceptable, but noted a lack of in-depth discussion and a somewhat list-like presentation of case studies, without explicitly rejecting it. After making the requested revisions and adding the case studies and discussions requested by the authors, the manuscript was resubmitted. The first reviewer provided two further comments, while the second reviewer indicated that their comments had been fully addressed. After revising the manuscript based on the first reviewer's feedback, the status was updated to accepted the following day.

2025-02-19

12.10 Submission
1.1 Reviewing, after contacting 9 reviewers, 2 accepted
1.26 Rejection. The reviewers and editors were very quick. One reviewer was more gentle, while the other criticized it thoroughly, but the suggestions were still constructive. The editor was kind enough to offer a chance to submit to another journal. It's a pity that the year didn't end well, but the reviewers' feedback was still valuable.

2024-12-07

Hello, what's the situation now? Mine also went straight to dip without being under review.

2024-09-04

For papers with long DIP times, they have all been rejected. There is no need to wait, just resubmit directly. They have transferred the papers to another team, who will recommend them to another journal.

2024-08-26

I have been on a diet for a month and a half. How did yours turn out in the end?

2024-08-15

Without undergoing under review, it has become "Decision in Process." It has been half a month now, who knows what the situation is.

2024-08-15

After "With editor," it goes directly to "Decision in Process." It has been in the "Decision in Process" status for half a month. Does anyone know if it has been sent for review?

2024-06-22

For the use of all the experts for peer review. Copy and paste for convenience.

2024-06-22

I would like to request authors' analysis of recent review articles that are similar, as well as any new content or perspectives they offer. Please also provide an explanation of how the target audience of the journal could benefit from the article, based on the previous explanations.

2024-06-22

Addressing and identifying research gaps, and pointing the way for future work should go beyond mere description of identified articles and include a degree of analysis and conceptual information. All of this work is presented in the abstract of the review, which cannot manipulate the information extracted from the literature.